Notes and reflections on history and education

Media Literacy Challenge #12: Epistemic humility
2026 Media Literacy Challenge #12: Epistemic humility
This post is part of The Nomadic Professorโ€™s 2026 Media Literacy Challenge: Read Smarter Online! Twice a month throughout 2026, Americaโ€™s 250th anniversary year, we’re sharing one small skill to help you read better onlineโ€”social media, YouTube, podcasts, newsletters, forums, magazines, journals, newspapers, and everything between. Follow along or join and enter the drawing to win free courses or Amazon gift cardsโ€”including a grand prize of lifetime access to all Nomadic Professor courses, or a $500 Amazon gift card. Learn more here.

โ€œEpistemically humbleโ€ is a fancy way of saying someone is not self-righteous, not dogmatic, not dismissive, not rigid, but instead knows they could be wrong, stays open to new evidence and better arguments, and holds their beliefs lightly, because they know thereโ€™s a good chance theyโ€™re going to be wrong a lot.ย 

Not to be confused, however, with someone who changes their opinions based on trends, believes whatever they happened to hear last, or who makes way for every argument, however outlandish.

Maybe the sweet spot is confidence in your method for figuring out whatโ€™s true, but a light grip on your actual conclusions. Like a scientist who is confident that the scientific method can lead to answers, but open to their own fallibility and limited experience.ย 

So hereโ€™s your challenge: identify and share the last time you were wrong about something. Could be anything other than a personal squabbleโ€”politics, history, current events, medicine, literature, geography, sports, economics. Bonus points if your example is more than just a straightforward factual error, but an opinion you actually had to change based on evidence.

Enjoy!

Media Literacy Challenge 2026 โ€“ Skill #12: Epistemic humility

Definitions

epistemology:

the study of how we know what we know

epistemic humility:

awareness that you could be wrong

intolerance of ambiguity or uncertainty:ย 

the tendency to reject information or seek resolution when there is a lack of certainty; the inability to let a thing be ambiguous or uncertain, but instead try to force or even invent conclusions that make it more tidy

Downloadables:

Links:ย 

8 Responses

  1. A topic that I am definitely having to have some Epistemically humility with is the shrinking of the Great Salt Lake. Everything in the news is very doomsday on the topic, but as I have talked with people who are in the natural resource industry, their feelings arenโ€™t quite concrete. It has led to more research and talking on my part. My opinion is still up in the air but definitely more in the middle than before.

  2. When I was in 5th grade, my teacher taught us that blood is blue, and it turns red when exposed to oxygen, but recently I learned that it is red the whole way through, it just looks blue because of how light works.

  3. In a college religion course the professor lectured on faith one day. He said we often think we know what something looks like, such as the front of a house. Front door, windows, porch, peaked roof etc. But houses are three dimensional, so someone else may have a better understanding of the side of the house or the back of the house, or maybe they are inside the house. Just because I had never seen the back of the house didnโ€™t mean it wasnโ€™t real. I think about that house often when I want to hold on to a narrow preconceived idea. My example is a little silly and not the most recent, but a friend and I agreed while talking about married coupleโ€™s age gaps, 5 years was a big gap and 10 years was the absolute max. But a couple years later I dated and married someone 15 years older than I am. Eighteen wonderful years later, I cringe to think if I had held on to my original idea and chose not to get to know him better only because of a preconceived idea.

  4. My Uncle was a teacher at a large city highschool with a diverse student body. He told me that if you were, when not in a person’s presence, able to recall a person’s race, color, ethnicity, or national origin then that meant you were prejudice and that prejudiced people were horrible people. He was important in my life so I just accepted and believed what he said, as if he was telling me that it’s important to eat your vegetables. I felt terrible for a very long time because I was able to recall these things about people I knew. I talked to other people, did some reading and studying, and a lot of thinking. Finally, much later, I told him that I disagreed with him. If one can notice and remember that someone wears glasses, or the color of their hair or eyes, is in a wheelchair, or wears a wedding ring, has pierced ears, or their sex, that is not a evidence of being prejudiced to be able to recall those details, and neither is being able to recall race, color, ethnicity, or national origin. I thought that the issue was whether you prejudged a person’s character, physical ability, intelligence, or other factor, based on those or other traits. My Uncle did not like my challenging him and told me I was just ignorant and I should not question my elders. This was, I think, the first time I challenged what I was told by an authority figure, and changed my belief, but it certainly wasn’t the last.

  5. I had a hard time finding something recent as an example, even after asking my family…who I thought would enjoy the chance to tell me when I was last wrong about something! The only recent thing I can remember that is not just about pure facts, is when certain medication needed adjusting. To put this in context, I was a biochemist and worked as a pharmaceutical chemist for much of my career before quitting to have a family. I tend to think of myself as fairly well educated when it comes to pharmaceuticals, in particular the medication that needed adjusting. I understand it at a biochemical level (I thought), and I was convinced there would be negative consequences of an adjustment, both mentally and physicallyโ€ฆ because, you know, I โ€œknow it allโ€ apparently. (sigh) So I wrote a long message to my doctor, explaining how I was feeling, knowing that she was going to increase it. I had all these justifications as to why that would’t work. Had the responses all lined up. I thought I had all the side effects figured out. I thought I knew more than my doctor, apparently. To skip to the end – So I took the meds as my Dr. prescribed them – and to my complete shock – it was night and day in the most wonderful way! A bitter pill to swallow (literally), I realized that I could have been feeling better a long time ago if I had just trusted my doctor instead of thinking I knew it all. After applying a healthy dose of humor to the situation to alleviate my shame, I tried to figure out why the medication was working, and where my โ€œfactsโ€ were wrong. I still havenโ€™t figured it out – despite my research – and I suppose that might be the other lesson in this for me. Sometimes, itโ€™s okay to just not understand something to the depth that you want. I donโ€™t need to know the exact mechanism for how this medication works, in order to accept the fact that it works in the complete opposite way that I thought for sure I โ€œknew.โ€ In many ways itโ€™s easier for me to be wrong about something when itโ€™s not what I consider in my circle of expertise/experience/interest. I tend to be โ€œEpistemically humbleโ€ when itโ€™s outside of that bubble. And well.. in your words โ€œMaybe the sweet spot is confidence in your method for figuring out whatโ€™s true, but a light grip on your actual conclusions. Like a scientist who is confident that the scientific method can lead to answers, but open to their own fallibility and limited experience.โ€ – I didnโ€™t have a method for figuring out what was true at the time, because my ego and past experiences with being right about things such as that, very much got in the way. I need to learn to develop that sweet spot you refer to – in all things!

  6. Thankfully, I did find an example of when I had an opinion and then changed it(today) when I was studying Latin pronunciation. I thought my mom was wrong(she did not know that I thought that) when she said to pronounce the ending -us a certain way; I thought the ‘u’ made a sound like “uh.” The book said to pronounce ‘u’ like the ‘u’ in “put,” but I ended up pronouncing it like “uh,” without realizing my mistake, and I stoutly believed I was right. However, after I said “put” several times in my head, I realized I was pronouncing -us incorrectly. In fact, “uh” is the sound used for the short ‘a’.

  7. Back in the late 1900’s (90’s) I used to work at a shoe store. I was trained to use the foot measurement tool and used it a lot to fit people to the correct size…..or at least i thought I did. At some point I began getting holes in my socks where my big toe was. I chalked it up to poor quality socks. My feet hurt a lot and I wrote it off as a side effect to running 2-4 miles daily. Fast forward to 20016 and I was still buying new socks because of the holes and my feet still hurt. My wife suggested that I was wearing the wrong size shoes and that it was the root cause to the holes in my socks. I disagreed and mentioned that I worked at shoe store in the 90’s and know how to fit people for shoes. She disagreed and wanted to measure my feet. I reluctantly let her trace my feet on paper and she went to work looking for shoes. She ordered me a pair of shoes a size and a half larger than what i was wearing. I didn’t believe it but went along with it anyway since it was free returns. Well, those new shoes she ordered me felt amazing, my feet stopped hurting because they weren’t scrunched into shoes that didn’t fit. And the best part was no more holes in my socks! It’s a running joke now whenever I get new shoes that I know what I’m doing because I worked in a show store lol. I wonder how many people out there that I fitted for shoes are still walking around in shoes that don’t fit.

  8. At the beginning of my chemistry course this year, I was getting bad grades on several of my lab write-ups even when I felt really confident in my answers. As a result I thought that the teacher was an unfair grader. When I complained, she gave me her reasons why she marked me off so much. In addition, my dad told me that she was just pushing me academically to be more precise and accurate when writing my lab write-ups. Given what they said, I soon realized that the teacher was in fact being a fair teacher, and was just pushing me academically. I adapted, learned how to write more carefully, and fell in love with chemistry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Blog Archive

Media Literacy Challenge #14: What is โ€œAI cultureโ€?

Learn the posted definitions of โ€œtypographical culture,โ€ โ€œentertainment culture,โ€ and โ€œthe medium...

Read More

Media Literacy Challenge #13: Long-form information

In this latest installment, we look at three rules of thumb I...

Read More

Media Literacy Challenge #12: Epistemic humility

In this latest installment, we take a look in the mirror to...

Read More

Media Literacy Challenge #11: Define “journalism”

โ€œJournalismโ€ is not some universal and unchanging ideal, sometimes reverently called โ€œthe...

Read More

Media Literacy Challenge #10: “Fact-checking the mailman”

If your only move after hearing a claim is to look into...

Read More

Media Literacy Challenge #9: Polarization

Polarization in the United States seems obviousโ€”but what explains it, and is...

Read More

Media Literacy Challenge #8: Journalism vs. advocacy

When reading articles online, always ask: Is this outlet trying harder to...

Read More

Media Literacy Challenge #7: The Quiet Majority

If you use social media, this oneโ€™s a must: check out The...

Read More

Media Literacy Challenge #6: โ€œAttention budgetโ€

Note the expression, pay attention. You should take this pretty literally. The...

Read More

Media Literacy Challenge #5: โ€œThe medium is the messageโ€

Socrates famously worried about the invention of writing for the way it...

Read More

Media Literacy Challenge #4: Emotional reasoning

โ€œThe real problem of humanity is the following: we have paleolithic emotions,...

Read More

Media Literacy Challenge #3: Knowing your limits

To be literate with the media, we have to be honest about...

Read More

Media Literacy Challenge #2: Corroboration

In 1983 Stanislav Petrovโ€™s decision to โ€œcorroborateโ€ the information his computer was...

Read More

Media Literacy Challenge #1: Lateral reading

The Nomadic Professorโ€™s 2026 Media Literacy Challenge: Read Smarter Online! Twice a...

Read More

What kind of history does the Nomadic Professor do?

Nomadic Professor teaches history as method, not ideology: build knowledge, then master...

Read More

Q&A with The Nomadic Professor: Behind the Scenes on the American History series

With the recent roll-out of the complete American History series by The...

Read More

Whose “Last Frontier”?

How do we explore history without choosing sides? In tackling various angles...

Read More

Instructor/Parent Question: Do your courses center God?

Recently, we received another question from a parent considering our courses for...

Read More

Instructor/Parent Question: Do you teach a whitewashed version of history?

We received the following question this week from someone considering our courses...

Read More

A Suggestion for Improving Student Writing

An excerpt from Nate Noorlander’s recent article on Bookshark’s blog, published 1...

Read More

Sign up now for The Nomadic Professor’s newsletter to unlock 9 free research tools. Also receive course updates, learning tips, and exclusive offers!

The Nomadic Newsletter

Sign up now for The Nomadic Professor’s newsletter to unlock 9 free research tools. Also receive course updates, learning tips, and exclusive offers!

Purchase: Bulk Discounts

Number of seats
Discount
Purchase per seat
1
$249
2โ€“4
โ€“25%
$186.75
5โ€“9
โ€“30%
$174.30
10โ€“19
โ€“35%
$161.85
20+
โ€“40%
$149.40

Subscription: Bulk Discounts

Number of seats
Discount
Subscription per seat
1
$30 / month
2โ€“4
โ€“25%
$22.50 / month
5โ€“9
โ€“30%
$21 / month
10โ€“19
โ€“35%
$19.50 / month
20+
โ€“40%
$18 / month

Comments? Corrections? Questions? Exceptional content? Whatever it may be, we’d appreciate you getting in touch.

Reach out to The Nomadic Professor!

Comments? Corrections? Questions? Exceptional content? Whatever it may be, we’d appreciate you getting in touch.

Free Course Previews

Sign up now for free access to sample sessions of The Nomadic Professor’s courses!